• Margaret O'Connor, Louise Peters, Susan Lee, and Cecilia Webster.
• Faculty Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Australia.
• J Palliat Care. 2005 Jan 1;21(2):97-102.

AbstractThis paper discusses a small study that was undertaken in a palliative care unit (PCU) to demonstrate reasons for the lengthy patient turnover time after the death of a patient. The study arose from a managerial challenge about the PCU's efficiency in comparison to other settings of care. While palliative care services in Australia are loosely funded on a per diem rate, casemix funding models for inpatient services in other settings reward efficiency in terms of length of stay (1). The aim of the study was to undertake a post-death survey, from the nursing perspective, of activities and the time required to deliver follow-up care, as required, to the deceased patient and his/her family. Details of the post-death episode for all patients who died in the PCU over two time periods were collected using a newly designed tool. This paper does not argue for the incorporation of post-death nursing work as a measure of efficiency or quality; rather, it is a demonstration of the type of work and the time involved in carrying out post-death work. This nursing work is an essential but hidden and generally unacknowledged element of palliative care and, not surprisingly, there is a dearth of literature describing the role of the nurse in providing care of the family and others after the patient has died. This project has provided important information about the factors that protract after-death care, and gives some insight into the role of the nurse after a death occurs in a PCU.

12 keywords...

hide…