• Karol P Budohoski, Bernhard Schmidt, Peter Smielewski, Magdalena Kasprowicz, Ronny Plontke, John D Pickard, Jurgen Klingelhöfer, and Marek Czosnyka.
• Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK. kpb26@cam.ac.uk
• Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 2012 Jan 1;114:121-5.

IntroductionAn existing monitoring database of brain signal recordings in patients with head injury has been re-evaluated with regard to the accuracy of estimation of non-invasive ICP (nICP) and its components, with a particular interest in the implications for outcome after head injury.MethodsMiddle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (FV), ICP and arterial blood pressure (ABP) were recorded. Non-invasive ICP (nICP) was calculated using a mathematical model. Other signals analysed included components of ICP (n" indicates non-invasive): ICP pulse amplitude (Amp, nAmp), amplitude of the respiratory component (Resp, nResp), amplitude of slow vasogenic waves of ICP (Slow, nSlow) and index of compensatory reserve (RAP, nRAP). Mean values of analysed signals were compared against each other and between patients who died and survived.ResultsThe correlation between ICP and nICP was moderately strong, R = 0.51 (95% prediction interval [PI] 17 mm Hg). The components of nICP and ICP were also moderately correlated with each other: the strongest correlation was observed for Resp vs. nResp (r = 0.66), while weaker for Amp vs. nAmp (r = 0.41). Non-invasive pulse amplitude of ICP showed the strongest association with outcome, with the -difference between those who survived and those who died reaching a significance level of p < 0.000001.DiscussionWhen compared between patients who died and who survived mean nAmp showed the greatest difference, suggesting its potential to predict mortality after TBI.

23 keywords...

hide…