• S Tejman-Yarden, A Zlotnik, L Weizman, J Tabrikian, A Cohen, N Weksler, and G M Gurman.
• Division of Pediatrics, Soroka Medical Center, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel. teyman@bgumail.bgu.ac.il
• Anesth. Analg. 2007 Aug 1;105(2):397-404.

IntroductionMonitoring methods for the early diagnosis of one-lung intubation (OLI) are nonspecific and controversial. In this study, we evaluated a new acoustic monitoring system for the detection of OLI.MethodsLung sounds were collected from 24 adult surgical patients scheduled for routine surgical procedures. Four piezoelectric microphones attached to the patients' backs were used to sample lung sounds during induction of anesthesia and endotracheal tube positioning. To achieve OLI, the endotracheal tube was inserted and advanced down the airway so that diminished or no breath sounds were heard on the left side of the chest. The tube was then withdrawn stepwise until equal breath sounds were heard. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy confirmed the tube's final position. Acoustic analyses were preformed by a new algorithm which assumes a Multiple Input Multiple Output system, in which a multidimensional Auto-Regressive model relates the input (lungs) and the output (recorded sounds) and a classifier, based on a Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test, indicates the number of ventilated lungs without reconstructing the original lung sounds from the recorded samples.ResultsThis algorithm achieved an OLI detection probability of 95.2% with a false alarm probability of 4.8%.ConclusionHigher detection values can be achieved at the price of a higher incidence of false alarms.

16 keywords...

hide…