-
Review Meta Analysis
Meta-analysis of outcomes of the 2005 and 2010 cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines for adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest.
- Aiqun Zhu and Jingping Zhang.
- Nursing School of Central South University, Tongzipo Rd No. 172, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China; Department of Emergency, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
- Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jun 1; 34 (6): 1133-9.
ObjectivesThe post-cardiac arrest survival rate has remained low since the 2010 cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines were published. The present study aimed to review the 2010 vs 2005 CPR guideline outcomes in adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest.MethodsThe Pub Med, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles published between January 2006 and July 2015. We extracted the following from observational studies and intervention studies: first author's name, publication year, study duration, age of study population, and sample size. The primary outcome variables were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to discharge. The data were divided into 2005 (data collected before December 2010) and 2010 (data collected in December 2010 or later) CPR guidelines groups.ResultsTwenty-four original articles (77,605 patients) were included. Statistically significant heterogeneity (ROSC: P<.01, I(2)=97.9%; survival to discharge: P<.01, I(2)=98.3%) was seen, and a random-effects model was used to pool the outcomes. The pooled ROSC rate for the 2010 group (n=5; mean, 48%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.58) was only slightly higher than that of the 2005 group (n=19; mean, 47%; 95% CI, 0.38-0.57). The opposite result was noted in the pooled survival to discharge rates (2010: n=5, mean, 14%; 95% CI, 0.08-0.20 vs 2005: n=19; mean, 15%; 95% CI, 0.10-0.20). There was actually no significant difference in ROSC or survival to discharge outcomes between the 2 groups.ConclusionsThe 2010 CPR guidelines emphasized that high-quality chest compressions can increase the ROSC rate but did not show to improve long-term results.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.