• K Inui, Y Shimazaki, T Watanabe, T Takahashi, T Minowa, H Takeda, N Yanagawa, and Y Sotoda.
• Second Department of Surgery, Yamagata university School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
• Artif Organs. 1999 Dec 1;23(12):1107-12.

AbstractThe effects of Duraflo II heparin coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits, low-dose aprotinin, and steroids on the coagulation system, endothelial damage, and cytokine release were evaluated by comparing those treated with low-dose aprotinin and steroids. Twenty-four adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, or valve repair surgery were randomly assigned to 2 groups: either heparin-coated (Duraflo group, n = 12) or noncoated equipment (noncoated group, n = 12) groups. In the Duraflo group, the cardiopulmonary reservoir was also coated with heparin. There were no significant differences in age at the time of operation, aortic cross-clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and rectal temperature during cardiopulmonary bypass. Standard systemic heparinization was performed. Methylpredonisolone and low-dose aprotinin were given in both groups of patients. Serum XIIa factor, TAT, and IL-6 were significantly higher in the control group than in the Duraflo group during cardiopulmonary bypass (p < 0.01). Serum IL-8 was significantly higher in the control group than in the Duraflo group at 24 h after cardiopulmonary bypass (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in serum thrombomodulin and TNF-alpha; both were within normal during the study period. These results indicate that the use of Duraflo II heparin coated equipment and a heparin-coated cardiopulmonary reservoir suppressed excess coagulation and inflammatory reaction induced by cardiopulmonary bypass.

31 keywords...

hide…