• Pain · Apr 1988

    Test-retest reliability of the pain drawing instrument.

    • R B Margolis, J T Chibnall, and R C Tait.
    • Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, St. Louis University School of Medicine, MO 63104.
    • Pain. 1988 Apr 1;33(1):49-51.

    AbstractTest-retest reliability of a pain drawing instrument was investigated. Pain drawings of chronic pain patients (n = 51) were scored for percentage of total body surface in pain and location of pain. A test-retest reliability coefficient of r = 0.85 was calculated for a time interval that averaged 71 days. In addition, a percentage of agreement based on distribution of pain over time was calculated at 88.2%. The effect on reliability of age, gender and time-interval differences was investigated. The utility of the pain drawing instrument as a measure of extent of pain and location of pain over time is discussed.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…