• Kyuichi Kadota, Jonathan Villena-Vargas, Akihiko Yoshizawa, Noriko Motoi, Camelia S Sima, Gregory J Riely, Valerie W Rusch, Prasad S Adusumilli, and William D Travis.
• *Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Service †Department of Pathology ¶Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics #Department of Medicine, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Thoracic Oncology Service **Center for Cell Engineering, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY ‡Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa §Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto ∥Department of Diagnostic Pathology, the Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
• Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2014 Apr 1;38(4):448-60.

AbstractAccording to the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification, the lepidic predominant pattern consists of 3 subtypes: adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and nonmucinous lepidic predominant invasive adenocarcinoma. We reviewed tumor slides from 1038 patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma, recording the percentage of each histologic pattern and measuring the invasive tumor size. Tumors were classified according to the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification: 2 were AIS, 34 MIA, and 103 lepidic predominant invasive. Cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR) was used to estimate the probability of recurrence. Patients with AIS and MIA experienced no recurrences. Patients with lepidic predominant invasive tumors had a lower risk for recurrence (5-y CIR, 8%) than nonlepidic predominant tumors (n=899; 19%; P=0.003). Patients with >50% lepidic pattern tumors experienced no recurrences (n=84), those with >10% to 50% lepidic pattern tumors had an intermediate risk for recurrence (n=344; 5-y CIR, 12%), and those with ≤10% lepidic pattern tumors had the highest risk (n=610; 22%; P<0.001). CIR was lower for patients with ≤2 cm tumors than for those with >2 to 3 cm tumors (for both total and invasive tumor size), with the difference more pronounced for invasive tumor size (5-y CIR, 13% vs. 21% [total size; P=0.022] and 12% vs. 27% [invasive size; P<0.001]). Most patients with lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma who experienced a recurrence had potential risk factors, including sublobar resection with close margins (≤0.5 cm; n=2), 20% to 30% micropapillary component (n=2), and lymphatic or vascular invasion (n=2). It therefore may be possible to identify lepidic predominant adenocarcinomas that carry a low or high risk for recurrence.

26 keywords...

hide…