-
- Lars Morsø, Peter M Kent, and Hanne B Albert.
- Research Department, Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark. lars.morsoe@slb.regionsyddanmark.dk
- Clin J Pain. 2011 Jul 1;27(6):535-41.
ObjectiveThis study was designed to investigate whether the PainDETECT Questionnaire (PDQ) classification was predictive of outcomes at 3 and 12 months follow-up in low back pain (LBP) patients with associated leg pain. Identification of clinically important subgroups and targeted treatment is believed to be important in LBP care. The PD-Q is designed to classify whether a person has neuropathic pain, based on their self-reported pain characteristics. However, it is unknown whether this classification is a prognostic factor or predicts treatment response.MethodOne hundred forty-five participants were recruited in the secondary care. Inclusion criteria were 3 to 12 months of LBP and related leg pain. Baseline PDQ scores classified participants into 3 groups ("likely" to have neuropathic pain, "uncertain," and "unlikely") but did not affect treatment decisions. The outcome measures were LBP, leg pain, activity limitation, and self-reported general health. Scores were compared between those with "likely" neuropathic pain (neuropathic group) and "unlikely" (non-neuropathic group), using Mann-Whitney, Friedman, and χ tests.ResultsAt baseline, the neuropathic group had worse scores on all outcome measures, and analgesic use, sick leave, and sense of coherence (P = 0.000 to 0.044). At 3 months and 12 months, both groups improved (P = 0.001 to 0.032). However, the groups remained different at each time point on all outcome measures (P = 0.000 to 0.033) except LBP (P = 0.054 to 0.214).Discussion And ConclusionsThe PDQ classification was a prognostic factor but was not predictive of response to treatment that was not targeted to neuropathic pain. Further studies should investigate whether PD-Q groups are predictive of treatment response when targeted to neuropathic pain.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.