• Respiratory care · Dec 2014

    Observational Study

    Spirometric Standards and Patient Characteristics: An Exploratory Study of Factors Affecting Fulfillment in Routine Clinical Practice.

    • Jordi Giner, Vicente Plaza, Jordi Rigau, Judit Solà, Ignasi Bolíbar, and Joaquín Sanchis.
    • Respiratory Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, and the Institute of Biomedical Research (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. jginer@santpau.cat.
    • Respir Care. 2014 Dec 1;59(12):1832-7.

    BackgroundSpirometry is an apparently simple test, yet the recommended criteria for acceptability and reproducibility can be difficult to fulfill. This study aimed (1) to prospectively assess the number of tests that meet the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) 2005 acceptability and repeatability criteria in the routine practice of an experienced technician at a referral hospital's lung function laboratory, (2) to identify the most common errors, and (3) to explore patient characteristics possibly associated with failure to meet standards.MethodsWe prospectively evaluated 257 consecutive spirometries supervised by the same technician, who gave priority to achieving a minimum of 3 correct maneuvers within a maximum of 8 attempts. We recorded FVC, FEV1, expiratory time (TE), back-extrapolated volume (VE), end-of-test volume (VEOT), number of maneuvers with and without errors, and errors (VE > 0.15 L or 5% of FVC, TE < 6 s, and VEOT ≥ 0.025 L for ≥ 1 s).ResultsTwo-hundred and fifteen spirometries (83.7%, 95% CI 78.6-87.7%) met the ATS/ERS 2005 criteria. Acceptability criteria were met in 73.9% (95% CI 71.2-76.3%) of the maneuvers and repeatability criteria in 90.7% (95% CI 86.5-93.6%). A mean ± SD of 3.3 ± 1.4 per subject was acceptable, and a mean ± SD of 4.5 ± 1.9 was obtained. TE and VEOT errors were the most common.ConclusionsNearly 15% of the subjects failed to fulfill all the ATS/ERS 2005 criteria for spirometry performed even though they were coached by a qualified and regularly trained technician in a hospital lung function laboratory. The fact that the ATS/ERS 2005 criteria cannot be met by all patients in optimal technical conditions should be further considered and explored.Copyright © 2014 by Daedalus Enterprises.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…