• M S Kristensen, W H Teoh, S S Rudolph, R Hesselfeldt, J Børglum, and M F Tvede.
• Department of Anaesthesia, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
• Anaesthesia. 2016 Jun 1; 71 (6): 675-83.

AbstractWe compared the transverse and longitudinal approaches to ultrasound-guided identification of the cricothyroid membrane, to determine which was faster and more successful. Forty-two anaesthetists received a one-hour structured training programme consisting of e-learning, a lecture and hands-on training, and then applied both techniques in a randomised, cross-over sequence to obese females with body mass index 39.0 - 43.9 kg.m(-2) . The mean (SD) time to identify the cricothyroid membrane was 24.0 (12.4) s using the transverse technique compared with 37.6 (17.9) s for the longitudinal technique (p = 0.0003). Successful identification of the cricothyroid membrane was achieved by 38 (90%) anaesthetists using either technique. All anaesthetists were successful in identifying the cricothyroid membrane with at least one of the techniques. We advocate the learning and application of these two techniques for identification of the cricothyroid membrane before starting anaesthesia in difficult patients, especially when anatomical landmarks are impalpable. Further use in emergency situations is feasible, if clinicians have experience and the ultrasound machine is readily available.© 2016 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

This article appears in the collections: General Stuff and Ultrasound.

24 keywords...

hide…