• Langenbecks Arch Surg · Jan 2008

    Organ dysfunction and long term outcome in secondary peritonitis.

    • M Hynninen, J Wennervirta, A Leppäniemi, and V Pettilä.
    • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, PO Box 340, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00029 HUS Helsinki, Finland. marja.hynninen@hus.fi
    • Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008 Jan 1;393(1):81-6.

    Background And AimsSecondary peritonitis is still associated with high mortality, especially when multiorgan dysfunction complicates the disease. Good prognostic tools to predict long term outcome in individual patients are lacking and therefore require further study.Patients And Methods163 consecutive patients with secondary peritonitis were included, except those with postoperative or traumatic peritonitis. In 58 patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU), organ dysfunction was quantified using Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in the first 4 days. Predictive factors for poor outcome were evaluated in all patients. Hospital and 1-year mortality was assessed.ResultsHospital mortality was 19% and 1-year mortality 23%. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), previous functional status, and sepsis category were predictive of fatal outcome in the total cohort (p = 0.034, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001). In patients treated in the ICU, advanced age and admission SOFA score were independent predictors of death (p = 0.014, p < 0.0001). The SOFA score showed the best discriminative ability for poor outcome (AuROC 0.78).ConclusionDegree of organ dysfunction measured using SOFA score was the best predictor of hospital mortality in patients suffering from secondary peritonitis.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.