• Lancet · Apr 1993

    Early prediction of individual outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

    • C Madl, G Grimm, L Kramer, W Yeganehfar, F Sterz, B Schneider, A Kranz, B Schneeweiss, and K Lenz.
    • Department of Medicine IV, University of Vienna, Austria.
    • Lancet. 1993 Apr 3;341(8849):855-8.

    AbstractPrediction of individual outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation is of major medical, ethical, and socioeconomic interest but uncertain. We studied the early predictive potency of evoked potential recording after cardiac arrest in 66 resuscitated patients who returned to spontaneous circulation but were unconscious and mechanically ventilated. Detailed long-latency and short-latency sensory evoked potentials were recorded and neurological evaluations were done 4-48 h after admission to intensive care. In all 17 patients with favourable outcome (cerebral performance categories 1 and 2) the cortical evoked potential N70 peak, a reliable measure of cortical function, was detected between 74 and 116 ms. In 49 patients with bad outcome (categories 4 and 5) the N70 peak was absent in 35 or found with a delay between 121 and 171 ms in 14 (p < 0.05 vs favourable outcome). Thus the predictive ability was 100% with cutoff of 118 ms. To confirm reproducibility and validity, repeated tracings, and linked-earlobe referenced techniques were done and gave similar results. Early recording of long-latency evoked potentials after cardiopulmonary resuscitation is highly predictive of outcome.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.