-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of three methods of bag valve mask ventilation.
- S Wheatley, A N Thomas, R J Taylor, and T Brown.
- Department of Anaesthesia, Salford Royal Hospitals, NHS Trust, UK.
- Resuscitation. 1997 Jan 1;33(3):207-10.
AbstractA method of bag valve mask ventilation in which the resuscitator compresses the self inflating bag between their open palm and the side of their body was compared with conventional single and two resuscitator bag valve mask ventilation. Fifteen nurses each ventilated three patients for 4 min following the induction of general anaesthesia, using one method per patient in random order. Tidal volume and peak mask pressures were higher with the two resuscitator technique than with either form of single resuscitator ventilation; There were no significant differences between the two methods of single resuscitator ventilation. Tidal volume: mean (S.D.); 'open palm': 270 ml (160); single resuscitator: 260 ml (220); two resuscitators: 480 ml (210). Peak mask pressure (mmHg): mean (SD); 'open palm': 19 (8); single resuscitator: 17(9); two resuscitator: 28 (11).
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..