• Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. · May 2002

    Review

    Nonpharmacologic relief of pain during labor: systematic reviews of five methods.

    • Penny P Simkin and MaryAnn O'hara.
    • Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98112, USA.
    • Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002 May 1;186(5 Suppl Nature):S131-59.

    AbstractNonpharmacologic measures to reduce labor pain have been used throughout history. Despite reports that some of these methods reduce pain, increase maternal satisfaction, and improve other obstetric outcomes, they have received limited attention in the medical literature and are not commonly available to women in North America. The controlled studies of nonpharmacologic methods are limited in number and sometimes provide conflicting results. This systematic review was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of the best studied techniques, as well as to highlight areas in need of further research. Five comfort measures were selected for review, based on these criteria: they have been evaluated with prospective controlled studies and they require institutional support (eg, skills, policies, equipment). These 5 methods included continuous labor support, baths, touch and massage, maternal movement and positioning, and intradermal water blocks for back pain relief. An extensive search of electronic databases and other sources identified studies for consideration. Critical evaluation of controlled studies of these 5 methods suggests that all 5 may be effective in reducing labor pain and improving other obstetric outcomes, and they are safe when used appropriately. Additional well-designed studies are warranted to further clarify their effect and to evaluate their cost effectiveness.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.