• J Manipulative Physiol Ther · Jan 1993

    Comparative Study

    The relationship between the St. Thomas and Oswestry disability scores and the severity of low back pain.

    • Y Y Co, S Eaton, and M W Maxwell.
    • Research Department, Anglo-European College of Chiropractic, Bournemouth, England.
    • J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993 Jan 1;16(1):14-8.

    ObjectiveTo investigate the relationship between the two disability questionnaires and low back pain severity using the visual analog scale (VAS).DesignOne hundred sixty-two chiropractic patients with low back pain were interviewed using an interactive microcomputer system. The sources of data were the St. Thomas and Oswestry disability questionnaires for disability and a VAS for pain severity. All were inherent in the computer interview system.SettingThe computer review system was set up in the Anglo-European College of Chiropractic outpatient clinic.Patients, ParticipantsOne hundred sixty-two consenting new patients from the general community suffering from low back pain who attended the Anglo-European College of Chiropractic outpatient clinic were asked to participate.Main Outcome MeasuresMain outcome measures were the St. Thomas and Oswestry disability questionnaires for disability and the VAS for low back pain severity.ResultsThere was a moderate correlation between the scores from the St. Thomas and Oswestry disability questionnaires (r = .77, p < .0001). A low but significant correlation score was found when comparing the St. Thomas and Oswestry disability score with pain severity (0.38, p < .0001, and 0.47, p < .0001, respectively).ConclusionThe consequence of pain (disability) appears to have a weak relationship to pain severity. Despite the moderate correlation between the two disability questionnaires, it is suggested that they are not interchangeable.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…