• JBR-BTR · Apr 2000

    Comparative Study

    [Evaluation of lumbar canal stenosis: decubitus imaging methods versus flexion-extension myelography and surface measurements versus the diameter of the dural sac].

    • B Coulier.
    • Service d'Imagerie Médicale, Clinique St Luc, Bouge, Namur, Belgium.
    • JBR-BTR. 2000 Apr 1;83(2):61-7.

    AbstractThough CT and MRI are presently the most frequently required noninvasive methods for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), imaging of a supine patient may not demonstrate the maximal spinal stenosis shown by upright flexion-extension myelography (FEM). Our prospective study tries to assess the averaging discrepancies between the supine CT-myelograms and the upright FEM in 50 patients. Considering all L2-L3 to L4-L5 vertebral levels, a mean underestimation of 16% of the diameter of the dural sac is found when and CT-myelograms are compared with extension myelography. Meaningful clinical discrepancies of 30% and more are found in 15.5% of these levels, the L5-S1 level remaining rather stable. Marked variations--but of less critical diagnostic interest--are also found between flexion and extension with, for flexion, a mean underestimation of 20% and discrepancies of 30% and more in 18.33% of L2-L3 to L4-L5 levels. Paradoxical results--CT diameters inferior to extension diameters--concern 22% of all studied levels but are of little clinical significance; only small discrepancies of 8.2% are found in a majority of non stenotic levels--with a maximal intensity for the L5-S1 level rarely implicated in LSS-. Measuring the mean cross-sectional surface occupied by the neural elements in the dural sac on CT-myelograms (189 evaluations), our study also empirically confirms a 60 to 80 mm2 are++ being the landmark of absolute stenosis. Finally, measurements of the cross-sectional area of the dural sac-109 L2-L5 levels inferior to 8.5 mm on CT myelograms or CT studies--show a large dispersion of areas for diameters superior to 6.5 mm and confirm cross-sectional area of the dural sac to be a much reliable parameter of LSS than diameter of the dural sac. We conclude that upright FEM--while not a first-line imaging modality for LSS--should be performed to exclude functional or dynamic position-dependent LSS in the patients whose symptoms are not explained by routine cross-sectional imaging, as long as no other upright technology is available.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.