• S Wildermuth, M Zanetti, S Duewell, M R Schmid, B Romanowski, A Benini, T Böni, and J Hodler.
• Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
• Radiology. 1998 May 1;207(2):391-8.

PurposeTo compare measurements of the sagittal diameter of the lumbar dural sac obtained at positional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and at functional myelography and to assess the influence of various body positions on the dural sac and the intervertebral foramina.Materials And MethodsThirty consecutive patients referred for lumbar myelography were examined with an open 0.5-T MR imager, Sagittal T2-weighted fast spin-echo images were acquired with patients in the supine, upright flexion, and upright extension positions. The midsagittal diameter of the dural sac was measured at the level of the disks on MR images and myelograms. Foraminal sizes on the MR images were scored independently by two observers.ResultsCorrelation between MR imaging and myelographic measurements was high (r = .81-.97). A small but statistically significant positional dependence of the dural sac diameter was found in the lower lumbar spine. Position-dependent differences in foraminal scores were uncommon.ConclusionQuantitative assessment of sagittal dural sac diameters is comparable between lumbar myelography and positional MR imaging. In a selected patient population, only small changes in the sagittal diameter of the dural sac and foraminal size can be expected between various body positions, and the information gained in addition to that from standard MR imaging is limited [corrected].

44 keywords...

hide…