• J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Dec 2014

    Real-World Outcomes of Hemostatic Matrices in Cardiac Surgery.

    • Scott M Tackett, Domenico Calcaterra, Glenn Magee, and Omar M Lattouf.
    • Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Westlake Village, CA. Electronic address: Scott_Tackett@baxter.com.
    • J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth.. 2014 Dec 1;28(6):1558-65.

    ObjectiveWhile hemostatic matrices are efficacious in achieving hemostasis, outcomes research is limited; therefore, this study analyzed clinical outcomes of flowable hemostatic matrices in a real-world cardiac surgical population.DesignRetrospective database analysis of cardiac surgical cases from 2006 to 2012.SettingData were extracted from Premier's United States (US) Perspective Database, developed for quality and utilization benchmarking and containing approximately 25% of US hospital discharges.ParticipantsCoronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic, valve, or valvular with CABG surgery cases in which FLOSEAL or SURGIFLO was included.InterventionsThree study groups were formed, given usage of hemostatic matrices: (1) FLOSEAL or SURGIFLO, exclusively; (2) FLOSEAL or SURGIFLO, with fibrin sealants, sealants, or powder hemostats; and (3) FLOSEAL or SURGIFLO, with nonflowable hemostats with or without thrombin. Outcomes included complications, transfusions, surgical revisions, mortality, length of stay (LOS) and surgery time.Measurements And Main ResultsGroup A included 4,480 FLOSEAL and 326 SURGIFLO cases. Results suggested SURGIFLO cases were associated with significantly higher risk of multiple adverse outcomes, including major (odds Ratio [OR] 2.12; 95% CI 1.34-3.35; p = 0.001) and minor complications (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.33-2.55; p<0.001); surgical revisions (OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.03- 3.94; p = 0.042); transfusions for any blood products (OR 4.90; 95% CI 3.50-6.87; p<0.001); and longer surgery times (adjusted mean difference = 64 minutes, p<0.001) than the FLOSEAL group. There were no significant differences in mortality and LOS. Results were similar in groups B and C.ConclusionsThese retrospective outcomes suggested FLOSEAL was associated with fewer negative consequences than SURGIFLO in this surgical population.Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.