• G M Vilke, D B Hoyt, M Epperson, D Fortlage, K C Hutton, and P Rosen.
• University of California, San Diego Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine 92103-8676.
• J Emerg Med. 1994 Mar 1;12(2):217-24.

AbstractThe purpose of this study is an analysis of 630 field intubations of trauma patients by flight personnel of the San Diego Life Flight program. We compared nasotracheal intubation to rapid sequence induction orotracheal intubation and noninduced orotracheal intubation. We measured success of intubation route, complications, and overall patient outcome. Flight records, quality assurance flight procedure data, and hospitalization data from the San Diego Trauma Registry were reviewed over a 4-year period, from 1988 to 1991. The results of our study show that rapid sequence induction orotracheal intubation has a higher success rate, fewer complications, and a better patient outcome compared to noninduced orotracheal intubation and blind nasotracheal intubation. We recommend that rapid sequence induction oral intubation be the standard method for prehospital airway management in trauma patients.

12 keywords...

hide…