• Nicholas Ryan, Colin Carroll, Mary B Carter, Craig S Roberts, Arthur L Malkani, and Brian G Harbrecht.
• Department of Surgery, †Office of Medical Education, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
• Am Surg. 2011 Apr 1;77(4):476-9.

AbstractTrauma centers are limited resources, particularly in rural areas, and availability of emergency care in some parts of the United States may be inadequate. The declining number of orthopedic surgeons willing to care for injured patients has limited access to fracture repair in some communities. We studied the management of closed midshaft femur fractures in both trauma centers (TCs) and nontrauma centers (NTCs) to evaluate outcome for this common orthopedic injury and determine if these issues have affected fracture care in Kentucky. All patients 16-years-old and older who suffered femur fractures in Kentucky from 2004 and 2005 were identified. There were 334 TC patients and 341 NTC patients with closed, midshaft femur fractures. The mean age of TC patients (33 ± 17 years) was significantly lower than that of NTC patients (59 ± 25 years). TC patients were more likely men (71% vs 44%), had more associated injuries (2.4 ± 2.1 vs 0.5 ± 1.2), and had longer lengths of stay (8.3 ± 9.8 vs 6.4 ± 7.1 days) (TCs vs NTCs, all P < 0.005). Although both groups ultimately underwent internal fixation (97% vs 99%, TCs vs NTCs), TC patients were more likely (2.7% vs 0.3%) to receive external fixation than the NTC patients (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the percentage of patients that received only a closed reduction. There was no significant difference in hospital mortality (0.3% vs 0.9%, TCs vs NTCs, P = 0.62). Although differences in patient populations exist between TCs and NTCs, both TCs and NTCs manage substantial numbers of patients with closed, midshaft femur fractures with low mortality in this state database.

30 keywords...

hide…