• Spine · May 2006

    Multicenter Study

    Reliability of a novel classification system for thoracolumbar injuries: the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score.

    • Alexander R Vaccaro, Eli M Baron, James Sanfilippo, Sidney Jacoby, Jacob Steuve, Eric Grossman, Matthew DiPaola, Paul Ranier, Luke Austin, Ray Ropiak, Michael Ciminello, Chuka Okafor, Matthew Eichenbaum, Venkat Rapuri, Eric Smith, Fabio Orozco, Peter Ugolini, Mark Fletcher, Jonathan Minnich, Gregory Goldberg, Jared Wilsey, Joon Y Lee, Moe R Lim, Anthony Burns, Ralph Marino, Christian DiPaola, Laura Zeiller, Steven C Zeiler, James Harrop, D Greg Anderson, Todd J Albert, and Alan S Hilibrand.
    • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA. alexvaccaro3@aol.com
    • Spine. 2006 May 15;31(11 Suppl):S62-9; discussion S104.

    Study DesignProspective study of 5 spine surgeons rating 71 clinical cases of thoracolumbar spinal injuries using the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score (TLISS) and then re-rating the cases in a different order 1 month later.ObjectiveTo determine the reliability of the TLISS system.Summary Of Background DataThe TLISS is a recently introduced classification system for thoracolumbar spinal column injures designed to simplify injury classification and facilitate treatment decision making. Before being widely adopted, the reliability of the TLISS must be studied.MethodsA total of 71 cases of thoracolumbar spinal trauma were distributed on CD-ROM to 5 attending spine surgeons, including clinical/radiographic data, details of the TLISS, and a scoring sheet in which cases would be scored using the system. The surgeons were later assigned the task with the cases reordered. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability was calculated for TLISS components, total score, and surgeon's treatment decision using the Cohen unweighted kappa coefficients and Spearman rank-order correlation.ResultsInterrater reliability assessed by generalized kappa coefficients was 0.33 +/- 0.03 for injury mechanism, 0.91 +/- 0.02 for neurologic status, 0.35 +/- 0.03 for posterior ligamentous complex status, 0.29 +/- 0.02 for TLISS total, and 0.52 +/- 0.03 for treatment recommendation. Respective results using the Spearman correlation were 0.35 +/- 0.04, 0.94 +/- 0.01, 0.48 +/- 0.04, 0.65 +/- 0.03, and 0.51 +/- 0.04. Surgeons agreed with the TLISS recommendation 96.4% of the time. Intrarater kappa coefficients were 0.57 +/- 0.04 for injury mechanism, 0.93 +/- 0.02 for neurologic status, 0.48 +/- 0.04 for posterior ligamentous complex status, 0.46 +/- 0.03 for TLISS total, and 0.62 +/- 0.04 for treatment recommendation. Respective results using the Spearman correlation were 0.70 +/- 0.04, 0.95 +/- 0.02, 0.59 +/- 0.05, 0.77 +/- 0.04, and 0.59 +/- 0.05.ConclusionsThe TLISS has good reliability and compares favorably to other contemporary thoracolumbar fracture classification systems.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.