• Reg Anesth Pain Med · May 2007

    Ultrasound anatomy of the radial nerve in the distal upper arm.

    • Gillian L Foxall, Dean Skinner, Jonathan G Hardman, and Nigel M Bedforth.
    • Department of Anaesthesia, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
    • Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 May 1;32(3):217-20.

    Background And ObjectivesWe aimed to describe the ultrasound appearance of the radial nerve in the lateral aspect of the distal upper arm. This procedure was done to identify potential novel sites for ultrasound-guided radial-nerve block.MethodsWe scanned the lateral aspect of the distal upper arm in both arms of 50 healthy adult volunteers (equal gender distribution), using a 38 mm, 5 to 10 MHz, linear ultrasound probe (SonoSite MicroMaxx, Hitchen, UK). Three points were defined: A, midway between the anterior process of the acromion and lateral epicondyle of the humerus; B, one third of the distance between A and the lateral epicondyle; C, two thirds of the distance between A and the lateral epicondyle. Subjects' arms were scanned between A and C. We measured the maximal transverse (parallel to skin) and anteroposterior (perpendicular to skin) diameters of the radial nerve and calculated its cross-sectional area. Depth of the radial nerve from the skin surface was measured, and its shape and appearance were noted.ResultsAt point B, the radial nerve lay in the spiral groove of the humerus, closely associated with the profunda brachii artery and vein. At point C, the nerve had passed through the lateral intermuscular septum and lay between brachioradialis and brachialis muscles. In 99% of arms, the radial nerve was not visible at point A, but became visible between points A and B in 93% of arms. The depth at point B was significantly less than at point C (mean +/- SD: 1.21 +/- 0.35 vs. 1.71 +/- 0.35 cm; P < .001). The measured depth of the nerve was positively correlated (P < .001) with body mass index and with arm circumference, but not with gender. The radial nerve was oval-shaped at both sites, with a cross-sectional area of 3.1 +/- 0.7 mm(2) at point B and 2.9 +/- 0.7 mm(2) at point C.ConclusionsPoints B and C may represent convenient, novel sites for ultrasound-guided radial-nerve block. The nerve is clearly visualized and has not yet divided into superficial and deep branches. Point C may be the optimal site for radial-nerve block because of the smaller risk of vessel puncture. Our observations also demonstrate the ability of ultrasound to identify nerves at sites not clearly defined by surface anatomic landmarks.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…