• R Paz-Fumagalli, Y A Miller, B A Russell, M R Crain, R A Beres, and M W Mewissen.
• Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Radiology, Milwaukee 53226, USA.
• J Spinal Cord Med. 1997 Jul 1;20(3):341-4.

AbstractWe investigated the impact of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement in spinal cord injury patients at high risk for infusion phlebitis. The rate and etiology of phlebitis was investigated in two phases. During Phase I, peripheral IV cannulae and conventional central venous catheters (CVC) were used. During Phase II, patients identified to be at risk for phlebitis received PICCs. The number of peripheral IVs, CVCs and PICCs was tabulated for both phases of the study. Technical, infectious and thrombotic complications were studied prospectively for PICCs and retrospectively for CVCs. We found the rate of phlebitis was 16.5 percent and 2.4 percent for Phases I and II, respectively (p = 0.0002). Three infections occurred in 38 PICCs and one infection was documented in 13 conventional CVCs. The number of peripheral IVs and conventional CVCs was reduced significantly from Phase I to Phase II. No procedural complications, catheter sepsis or clinically apparent venous thrombosis occurred. In conclusion, PICCs reduced the rate of phlebitis thresholds with a low complication rate and reduced the use of peripheral IVs and conventional CVCs.

14 keywords...

hide…