-
Comparative Study
The role of computed tomography in the assessment of open periarticular fractures associated with deep knee wounds.
- Sanjit R Konda, Daniel Howard, Roy I Davidovitch, and Kenneth A Egol.
- NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
- J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Sep 1;27(9):509-14.
ObjectiveTo (1) determine the incidence and injury profile of open periarticular fractures about the knee joint in a cohort of patients presenting to the emergency department with a deep periarticular knee wound and to (2) determine the effectiveness of computed tomography (CT) scan to detect and guide management of these open fractures compared with plain radiographs (XRs).DesignRetrospective review.SettingLevel I trauma center.Patients/ParticipantsSeventy-eight patients (79 knees) with deep periarticular knee wounds of which 62 patients (63 knees) received both a XR and a CT scan of the knee.InterventionXR and CT scan of the injured knee.Main Outcome MeasurementsComparison of OTA fracture classification and surgeon produced management plan as determined by XRs versus CT scans. CT scan was considered the gold standard test to detect a fracture.ResultsTwenty-one (27%, 21/79) knees had an open periarticular fracture of the knee, and 95% (20/21) of these knees had intra-articular air indicative of an associated traumatic arthrotomy. Of 41 (52%, 41/79) knees with a traumatic arthrotomy, 51% (21/41) had an associated open periarticular fracture of the knee. XRs detected 18 fractures in 17 knees (of which 1 fracture was later determined to not be a true fracture), whereas CT scans detected 26 fractures in 21 knees. Overall, CT scans detected 9 additional fractures in 6 knees. The specificity, sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values of XRs to detect and rule out a fracture were 98%/65% and 94%/82%, respectively. Compared with XRs, CT scan altered the fracture classification in 48% of patients and altered the management plan in 43% of patients, respectively. Gunshot wounds to the knee had a 48% (12/25) incidence of an associated open periarticular fracture compared with a 17% (9/54) incidence for all other injury mechanisms combined (P < 0.01).ConclusionsPatients with a periarticular knee wound have a high incidence of open periarticular fractures, and the incidence is even higher if the mechanism of injury is a gunshot wound or there is associated traumatic arthrotomy. CT scan improves detection and management of open fractures of the knee compared with XRs. Consideration should be given to routinely using CT scan to evaluate knees with deep periarticular wounds that present to the emergency department, especially if secondary to gunshot injuries, given the high incidence of open periarticular fractures of the knee.Level Of EvidencePrognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.