-
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc · Apr 2016
Reliability of classification for post-traumatic ankle osteoarthritis.
- Femke M A P Claessen, Diederik T Meijer, Michel P J van den Bekerom, Barend D J Gevers Deynoot, Wouter H Mallee, Job N Doornberg, and C Niek van Dijk.
- Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Yawkey Centre, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School and University of Amsterdam Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. femke__claessen@hotmail.com.
- Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Apr 1; 24 (4): 1332-7.
PurposeThe purpose of this study was to identify the most reliable classification system for clinical outcome studies to categorize post-traumatic-fracture-osteoarthritis.MethodsA total of 118 orthopaedic surgeons and residents-gathered in the Ankle Platform Study Collaborative Science of Variation Group-evaluated 128 anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of patients after a bi- or trimalleolar ankle fracture on a Web-based platform in order to rate post-traumatic osteoarthritis according to the classification systems coined by (1) van Dijk, (2) Kellgren, and (3) Takakura. Reliability was evaluated with the use of the Siegel and Castellan's multirater kappa measure. Differences between classification systems were compared using the two-sample Z-test.ResultsInterobserver agreement of surgeons who participated in the survey was fair for the van Dijk osteoarthritis scale (k = 0.24), and poor for the Takakura (k = 0.19) and the Kellgren systems (k = 0.18) according to the categorical rating of Landis and Koch. This difference in one categorical rating was found to be significant (p < 0.001, CI 0.046-0.053) with the high numbers of observers and cases available.ConclusionsThis study documents fair interobserver agreement for the van Dijk osteoarthritis scale, and poor interobserver agreement for the Takakura and Kellgren osteoarthritis classification systems. Because of the low interobserver agreement for the van Dijk, Kellgren, and Takakura classification systems, those systems cannot be used for clinical decision-making.Level Of EvidenceDevelopment of diagnostic criteria on basis of consecutive patients, Level II.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.