• Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther · Feb 2006

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    [Evaluation of CVC-set].

    • M T Pawlik, P Lemberger, and E Hansen.
    • Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg. michael.pawlik@klinik.uni-regensburg.de
    • Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2006 Feb 1;41(2):79-85.

    ObjectiveFrequently central venous catheter sets do not contain all necessary materials. To evaluate, if combined measures using a specially arranged central venous catheter (CVC) set result in economical and clinical advantages, we compared both cost and time differences of a CVC complete set with ECG guide wire lead and an adhesive fixation with a standard set requiring additional materials, ECG fluid column lead and surgical suture. Furthermore, quality of different ECG leads, the reliability and tolerability of the adhesive fixation was compared.Methods76 elective adult surgical patients were randomly assigned to receive either a control CVC set or a test CVC complete set, which was featured by preconnected stopcocks, included sterile drapes, guide wire ECG position control, and an adhesive fixation. We performed ECG-guided placement of the central venous catheter using a guide wire lead in the test CVC set vs. fluid column lead in the control CVC set. Time was recorded for preparation phase of the nurse and the anesthetist, for the puncture phase, for the ECG position control and time for CVC fixation. Quality of ECG position control using guide wire or fluid column was determined by forming Pmax/R ratio. Costs of the complete set and the standard set with additional material were compared.ResultsTimes for preparation of nurse and anesthetists, for ECG position control and catheter fixation were significantly shorter using the test catheter set and resulted in a total time saving of 6 min (P < 0.01). Times for sterile preparation and central venous puncture were not significantly different between the groups. ECG position control using the guide wire was successful in 37 out of 38 patients (97%) and in 34 of 38 patients (89%), respectively. Pmax/R ratio was 0.8 +/- 0.2 using the guide wire versus 0.5 +/- 0.2, respectively. There were only 2 out of 38 adhesive fixations, that had to be replaced, while the mean duration of adhesive fixation was 6.2 days (3-15 days). Avoidance of disposable materials in the test CVC set led to a significant reduction of costs compared to the control CVC set.ConclusionThe test CVC complete set allows a significant time saving and cost reduction in performing a central venous catheter line because of completely included disposable materials. CVC position control via guide wire needs less time and shows significantly better quality of ECG compared to fluid column ECG lead. An adhesive revealed to be a reliable CVC fixation comparable to a surgical suture.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…