• Cahiers d'anesthésiologie · Jan 1992

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    [A comparative study of the cost of open-circuit as opposed to closed-circuit ventilation].

    • C Picard, D Gomez, A Roche, M Stöckle, S Saumtally, P Lefebvre, and M Sabathié.
    • Département d'Anesthésie, Centre Hospitalier Saint-André, Bordeaux.
    • Cah Anesthesiol. 1992 Jan 1;40(5):321-32.

    AbstractThe authors compared two open randomized groups of patients undergoing surgery through general anaesthesia. Group 1 consisted of 54 patients ventilated by a Siemens 900 B ventilator in open circuit, and group 2, 56 patients ventilated by an ELSA de Gambro ventilator in a closed circuit. Comparative hour cost for nitrous oxide (N2O), oxygen (O2) and halogen gas, Enflurane, Isoflurane, was noted. All patients received the same regimen of anaesthesia and the two groups were identical in age, weight, surgery, respiratory volume and ventilation time. The evaluation of comparative hour cost included specific materials of close circuit ventilator: CO2 filter (Aridus), Lime. Were excluded maintenance and gas consumption expenditures before patient connected to the ventilator. The total hour cost (O2, N2O, specific materials for close circuit, without halogen gas) was 8.23 FF in closed circuit against 13.28 FF in open circuit, an economy of 38.27%. Hence, for oxygen, the hour cost was 0.70 FF in open circuit against 0.27 FF in closed circuit (gain of 65.3%). For nitrous oxide, the hour cost in open circuit was 12.50 FF against 2.44 FF in closed circuit (80.5%). For Isoflurane, the open circuit hour cost was 41.38 FF against 22.44 FF in closed circuit (47%). For Enflurane, the open circuit hour cost was 14.17 FF against 5.94 FF in closed circuit (58.1%). And, lastly for Enflurane, open circuit hour cost was 14.17 FF against 5.94 FF in close circuit, gain of 58.1%. These "modest" economy against those found in previous studies can be explained by the long-time duration of ventilation, saturating time in open circuit more or less long, depending on the physician, specific materials for closed circuit ventilation--lime, CO2 filter--in not taken into account, the hour cost of O2 + NO2 goes from 8.23 FF to 2.71 FF, and the gain against the close circuit becomes 79.6%: reducing hour cost by 5 times. In order to improve the effective cost of close circuit, the authors proposed: the use of closed circuit ventilation for more than 3 hours surgery, gas saturation in closed circuit after denitrogenation--which demands the use of halogen infjectors, and lime in containers cheaper than disposable cartridges. Respecting the above criteria, the total hour cost in close circuit fell to 4.90 FF, gain of 63% against open circuit. For O2 et N2O, the hour cost goes from 1.34 FF in close circuit to 13.28 FF in open circuit, 90% economy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.