• Hepato Gastroenterol · May 2012

    Comparative Study

    Outcome of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy vs. open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective comparative study.

    • Wen-Jun Chen, Chao-Yang Xu, Jiang-Guo Shen, Shu-Duo Xie, Xiao-Ming Yuang, and Linbo Wang.
    • Department of Surgical Oncology, Zhejiang University College of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
    • Hepato Gastroenterol. 2012 May 1;59(115):938-41.

    Background/AimsLaparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy is still controversial because of scant evidence of safety and feasibility. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of using the laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy in treating gastric cancer and evaluate its outcome compared with conventional open gastrectomy.MethodologyBetween November 2005 and November 2007, 31 patients underwent laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and 95 patients underwent open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Clinicopathological characteristics, total number of lymph nodes retrieved and overall survival were retrospectively compared between the two groups.ResultsNo significant differences were found in the total number of retrieved lymph nodes (26.3±11.6 vs. 27.6±10.4) between the two groups. The mean follow-up and overall survival time after surgery was 30.8 (range 4-47) months and 40.9 months (95% confidence interval, 38.5-43.2 months), respectively. The mean survival time in patients of the laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy group was 42.4 months vs. 40.3 months in patients of the open surgery alone group (p=0.457). A logistic regression model revealed that node invasion (hazard ratio 1.149, p<0.001) and serosal invasion (hazard ratio 4.623, p=0.044) were associated with overall survival of gastric cancer patients.ConclusionsLaparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection is a safe and feasible procedure with adequate lymphadenectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.