• Drake G Lebrun, Iracema Saavedra-Pozo, Fernando Agreda-Flores, Mackenzie L Burdic, Michelle R Notrica, and K A Kelly McQueen.
• Thomas J. Watson Foundation, New York, NY, USA. drake.lebrun@gmail.com
• World J Surg. 2012 Nov 1;36(11):2559-66.

BackgroundUnderdeveloped nations suffer from significant deficiencies in surgical and anesthesia care. Although surgical inequities are a pressing issue internationally, the extent of these inequities is unknown due to a lack of data. The aim of this study was to assess surgical and anesthesia capacity in Bolivia as part of a multinational study assessing surgical and anesthesia infrastructure in Africa, Latin America, and South Asia.MethodsA standardized survey tool was used to obtain national-level health-care data at the Bolivian Ministry of Health. Hospital-specific data were obtained through interviews with key administrators and providers at 18 public basic and general hospitals in Bolivia.ResultsThere are 1,270 obstetrician/gynecologists and 1,807 surgeons in Bolivia. In contrast, there are 500 anesthesiologists, placing a large anesthesia burden on the country. Basic hospitals and general hospitals performed an average of 730 and 2,858 operations per year, respectively. One basic hospital was unable to perform any surgeries due to a lack of surgical manpower. All but two hospitals reported some lack of infrastructure, equipment, or pharmaceutical capacity. The ability to collect health outcomes was inconsistent in most hospitals.ConclusionsSurgical capacity varies throughout Bolivia. There are relatively large numbers of surgery providers but an insufficient number of anesthesiologists, suggesting a specific need for further development in anesthesia. Though there are many areas of strength within the Bolivian public health-care system, this survey identified several areas to which national policy and international collaboration can contribute in order to more adequately address major causes of surgical morbidity and mortality.

12 keywords...

hide…