• Spine · Sep 1999

    The prevalence of low back pain in the elderly. A systematic review of the literature.

    • H B Bressler, W J Keyes, P A Rochon, and E Badley.
    • University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. h.bressler@utoronto.ca
    • Spine. 1999 Sep 1; 24 (17): 181318191813-9.

    Study DesignThe prevalence of low back pain in the older population (> = or 65 years) was reviewed in an analysis of the literature from 1966 to the present.ObjectiveTo determine the prevalence of low back pain in the geriatric population.Summary Of Background DataBack pain is one of the most frequently reported conditions affecting the adult population. However, the prevalence of low back pain in the older age population is not accurately known.MethodsA methodologic search of five computerized bibliographic databases was performed to identify citations on the prevalence of low back pain in the elderly. Data were summarized, and prevalence studies were critically appraised in detail for their quality.ResultsThere is wide variability in the reported prevalence of back pain. Many factors have been proposed to explain these findings including sample source, study design, definitions of back pain, and use of patient-reported data. Comorbidity among older patients also contributes to the variability in the reporting of prevalence of back pain.ConclusionThere is an under-representation of the older population in the back pain literature. The data in the current study suggest that the prevalence of low back pain in this population is not known with certainty and is not comparable with that in the younger population. The authors stress the need for future studies to improve the reporting of age information to make prevalence studies more informative and applicable.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.