• D Williams, T Cahill, A Dowson, H Fearon, S Lipscombe, E O'Sullivan, T Rees, C Strang, A Valori, and D Watson.
• The Willows Surgery, Barry, South Glamorgan, Wales, UK.
• Curr Med Res Opin. 2002 Jan 1;18(1):1-9.

AbstractA retrospective audit was carried out to investigate triptan usage over a period of one year among 360 adult patients with migraine in nine GP practices in the UK and the Republic of Ireland. Data from patient records were analysed, in conjunction with replies to a questionnaire about patients' perceptions of their migraine and its treatment. The majority of patients included in the audit were women (83%), and most patients (81%) were aged between 35 and 64 years. Most patients in the audit population (60%) were in the lowest band of triptan usage (1-36 tablets prescribed over 12 months); 7% had moderate usage (37-53 tablets). A minority of patients appeared to be taking triptans in higher quantities: about 15% of patients had been prescribed 54-94 triptan tablets over a year, 9% had received prescriptions for 95-149 tablets and 7% had received prescriptions for 150 or more tablets. These results indicated that some migraine patients were using triptans at higher than expected rates, and suggested that some patients might have been using their prescribed triptans inappropriately to treat a headache that they incorrectly perceived as migraine (e.g. chronic daily headache). Analyses were carried out to identify predictors of high usage. Predictors identified included the use of several other (non-triptan) medications to treat conditions other than migraine, one triptan dose being reported as sufficient to treat an attack, patient's perception of all headaches as migraine and lack of concern about taking too much medication. Patients identified as using triptans at a higher than expected rate can be called in for review of migraine diagnosis, identification of possible causes of any increased frequency of attacks, and investigation of suspected non-migrainous headaches, such as chronic daily headache and medication-induced headaches. For GPs, such actions would help achieve and maintain a high standard of care for their migraine patients, thus helping to contribute towards meeting the demands of the clinical governance agenda. Audit of triptan usage may also offer financial benefits for the practice, since helping patients to avoid the inappropriate use of triptans could lead to reductions in the overall costs of triptan prescribing within the practice. The high usage predictors could be developed into a checklist of potential indicators for GPs to identify patients who may become high users if prescribed triptans and who might require closer monitoring. We recommend that patients identified as having a potential for high usage should be routinely reviewed, every 3-6 months, to ensure that they are using triptans appropriately to treat migraine. Although triptans are generally safe and well tolerated, unnecessary use of any medication should be avoided.

19 keywords...

hide…