• Clinical rehabilitation · Oct 2001

    Differences in treatment outcome between subgroups of patients with chronic low back pain using lumbar dynamometry and psychological aspects.

    • M M Hutten, H J Hermens, and G Zilvold.
    • Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, The Netherlands. m.hutten@rrd.nl
    • Clin Rehabil. 2001 Oct 1;15(5):479-88.

    ObjectiveTo investigate whether subgroups of patients with chronic low back pain show differences in treatment outcome, measured with the Roland Disability Questionnaire. (RDQ).SettingThe study was carried out in a rehabilitation centre.SubjectsEighty-four patients with chronic low back pain participated in this study.InterventionPatients followed a multidisciplinary treatment programme that primarily targets physical aspects. DESIGN AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Based on pretreatment lumbar dynamometry results and Symptom Checklist (SCL-90) scores, patients were divided into subgroups. The dynamometry subgroups were: performances lower than healthy subjects (expected performance), performances comparable with those of healthy subjects (normal performance) and inconsistent performances (submaximal performance). The SCL-90 subgroups were: a total score of 'average' or lower compared with a population of chronic pain patients (low psychological score) and a total score of 'above average' or higher compared with this population (high psychological score). Patients answered the RDQ in the week before (RDQ1; n = 84) and after treatment (RDQ2; n = 78) to investigate whether the subgroups show differences in outcome expressed as the percentage change between RDQ2 and RDQ1, (%RDQ2-1). A %RDQ2-1 > or = 20% was classified as an improvement.ResultsImprovement on disability level > or = 20% is shown in 64% and 55% of the patients with 'normal' and 'expected' lumbar dynamometry performances and low psychological scores compared with only 33% and 25% of those with high psychological scores. Patients with submaximal performances show hardly any changes in disability level and there are no differences betweenthose with low psychological scores (14%) and those reporting high scores (0%).ConclusionThe fact that patient subgroups with differences in treatment outcome can be defined using lumbar dynamometry and psychological questionnaires suggests that these instruments might facilitate treatment indication in clinical practice.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…