• A P Halpert, S D Pearson, and T Reina.
• Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates Division of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
• Eff Clin Pract. 1999 May 1;2(3):114-9.

BackgroundMany patients are admitted to acute-care hospitals when their medical needs might be more appropriately met in an extended-care facility (ECF).ObjectiveTo describe a cohort of patients who were admitted from an emergency department to an ECF.DesignObservational cohort study.Participants121 enrollees of Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates who were admitted directly from an emergency department to an ECF between October 1, 1994, and December 31, 1997.Outcome MeasuresMean length of stay, charges per patient, and discharge disposition (discharged to home, discharged to a long-term-care facility, died, or transferred to an acute-care hospital within 30 days of ECF admission).ResultsPatients admitted directly to an ECF were generally frail and elderly (median age, 75 years). Mean length of stay in the ECF was 11 days; the mean per-patient charge was $3290. Three quarters of patients were discharged from the ECF to their homes. Six percent (seven patients) were transferred from the ECF to an acute-care hospital within 30 days of ECF admission. None of these transfers clearly suggested that the initial decision to directly admit a patient to the ECF was inappropriate. Most patients were satisfied with direct ECF admission: Of the surviving, cognitively intact patients admitted to an ECF in 1997, 71% stated that they would choose direct admission to an ECF over admission to an acute-care hospital if they were "in a similar situation in the future."ConclusionsFor selected patients, direct admission to an ECF seems to be feasible, safe, and acceptable. A randomized, clinical trial is needed to fully assess the safety and cost implications of direct ECF admission.

19 keywords...

hide…