• Francesca Pischiutta, Giovanna D'Amico, Erica Dander, Andrea Biondi, Ettore Biagi, Giuseppe Citerio, Maria Grazia De Simoni, and Elisa R Zanier.
• IRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Department of Neuroscience, Milan, Italy.
• Neuropharmacology. 2014 Apr 1;79:119-26.

AbstractThe need for immunosuppression after allo/xenogenic mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) transplantation is debated. This study compared the long-term effects of human (h) bone marrow MSC transplant in immunocompetent or immunosuppressed traumatic brain injured (TBI) mice. C57Bl/6 male mice were subjected to TBI or sham surgery followed 24 h later by an intracerebroventricular infusion of phosphate buffer saline (PBS, control) or hMSC (150,000/5 μl). Immunocompetent and cyclosporin A immunosuppressed (CsA) mice were analyzed for gene expression at 72 h, functional deficits and histological analysis at five weeks. Gene expression analysis showed the effectiveness of immunosuppression (INFγ reduction in CsA treated groups), with no evidence of early rejection (no changes of MHCII and CD86 in all TBI groups) and selective induction of T-reg (increase of Foxp3) only in the TBI hMSC group. Five weeks after TBI, hMSC had comparable efficacy, with functional recovery (on both sensorimotor and cognitive deficits) and structural protection (contusion volume, vessel rescue effect, gliotic scar reduction, induction of neurogenesis) in immunosuppressed and immunocompetent mice. Therefore, long-term hMSC efficacy in TBI is not dependent on immunosuppressive treatment. These findings could have important clinical implication since immunosuppression in acute TBI patients may increase their risk of infection and not be tolerated.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

36 keywords...

hide…