• Ana Triviño, Miguel Congregado, Jesús Loscertales, Rafael Jiménez-Merchán, Nathalie Pinos-Vélez, Fernando Cózar, and Patricia Carmona-Soto.
• Servicio de Cirugía Torácica, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, España. Electronic address: atrivi_17@hotmail.com.
• Arch. Bronconeumol. 2014 Feb 1;50(2):57-61.

BackgroundSurgical treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can be performed either by thoracotomy or by employing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). The aim of this study was to compare long and short-term results of conventional surgery (CS) vs. VATS lobectomy in the treatment of stage I NSCLC.Materials And MethodsWe performed a retrospective, analytical study of patients undergoing surgery for stage I NSCLC during the period January 1993 to December 2005. The variables analyzed were overall survival, recurrence, distant metastasis, morbidity, mortality and hospital stay. During this period, 256 anatomic lung resections were performed: 141 by CS and 115 by VATS.ResultsThere were statistically significant differences in: (i)mean hospital stay in patients with no complications (VATS group: 4.3 days vs. CS group: 8.7 days, P=.0001); (ii)mean hospital stay in patients with complications (VATS: 7.2 days vs. CS: 13.7 days, P=.0001), and (iii)morbidity (VATS: 15.6% vs. CS: 36.52%, P=.0001). No statistically significant differences were found in: (i)mortality (VATS: 2.17% vs. CS: 1.7%, P=.88); (ii)5-year overall survival (VATS: 68.1% vs. CS: 63.8%), and (iii) local recurrence and distant metastasis (P=.82).ConclusionsVATS lobectomy is a safe and effective approach, with a shorter hospital stay and lower morbidity than CS; no statistically significant differences were observed in survival in patients undergoing surgery for stage I NSCLC.Copyright © 2013 SEPAR. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.

32 keywords...

hide…