• Health services research · Aug 1998

    Comparative Study

    Analysis, assessment, and presentation of risk-adjusted statewide obstetrical care data: the StORQS II study in Washington State. Statewide Obstetrics Review and Quality System.

    • R Holubkov, V L Holt, F A Connell, and J P LoGerfo.
    • Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Seattle, USA.
    • Health Serv Res. 1998 Aug 1;33(3 Pt 1):531-48.

    ObjectiveTo develop an effective, concise presentation of hospital-specific birth event and delivery-related complication rates, including significant deviations from expected rates calculated using risk-adjusted peer hospital data, for distribution to all Washington State hospitals with delivery services.Data SourcesComplete data for calendar year 1993, including inpatient discharge records for mothers and newborns, birth certificates, and infant death records, for 74 hospitals from Washington state source files.Study DesignInstitutions were classified into four peer groups based on presence of neonatal intensive care units, number of births, and rural/urban location. Twenty-three clinical indicators of procedure (e.g., cesarean section) and complication rates were analyzed and presented.MethodsFor each indicator, observed and expected rates (adjusted within peer group for categorized baseline risk factors) were calculated and presented by institution. Effective graphic and numeric techniques for presenting significant deviations from expected rates were developed. Results were calculated in terms of numbers of events as well as rates. Approaches applicable to institutions with small numbers of deliveries were selected.Principal FindingsExact confidence intervals (C.I.s) for event rates were superior to binomial or Poisson approximations for small hospitals. For calculating expected rates, indirect adjustment was used due to small numbers within risk factor categories. For all indicators, observed and expected rates along with 95 percent C.I.s for the true rate were presented graphically by institution for each peer group. Transforming C.I.s into "statistically acceptable ranges" allowed hospital personnel to assess their performance in terms of actual numbers of events as well as rates.ConclusionsReadily available statistical methods and straightforward descriptive approaches allow accurate presentation of outcomes for both large and small institutions.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.