• K R Ward.
• Ohio State University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbus 43210, USA.
• Acad Emerg Med. 1994 Sep 1;1(5):482-9.

ObjectiveTo propose reasons for the variability of the hemodynamic responses and survival data observed when interposed abdominal compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (IAC-CPR) is performed on humans in cardiac arrest.MethodsCritical content review of all studies performed in the United States examining IAC-CPR in humans and of selected animal studies addressing hemodynamic mechanisms of CPR. Articles in the English language dealing with human IAC-CPR studies from 1970-1993 were retrieved using the MEDLINE database of the National Library of Medicine.ResultsIAC-CPR does not consistently improve coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) over standard CPR in humans and is capable of decreasing as well as increasing CPP. This variability does not seem dependent on the manner in which abdominal compressions are performed. Because of the limited response to standard CPR, significant increases in return of spontaneous circulation would be expected with IAC-CPR if a large percentage of patients were to have favorable increases in CPP. However, other patients may be adversely affected by decreases in CPP during IAC-CPR, with unsuccessful resuscitation of those individuals. Return of spontaneous circulation also may be enhanced using IAC-CPR due to other factors reflected in the initial arrest rhythm and in arrest-population demographics.ConclusionIAC-CPR should not be recommended for routine use until the mechanism of its beneficial effects is known and until those patients who are likely to benefit from the technique can be better identified.

13 keywords...

hide…