• Shu-Qing Wang, You-Shui Gao, Jia-Qi Wang, Chang-Qing Zhang, Jiong Mei, and Zhi-Tao Rao.
• Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
• Indian J Orthop. 2011 Mar 1;45(2):125-31.

BackgroundHigh-energy fractures of posterior tibial plateau always need surgical treatment. Generally, posterior fragments of these fractures could not be exposed and reduced well in conventional anterior approaches. Although a posterolateral/posteromedial approach to manage posterior tibial plateau fractures can achieve satisfactory results, there are few presentations concerning the treatment of these high-energy injuries based on posterior approaches combined with anterior approach if necessary.Materials And MethodsTen cases of posterior tibial plateau fractures from high-energy injuries were retrospectively reviewed and followed up for mean 26.5 months (range 14-45 months). A posterolateral/posteromedial approach was adopted primarily to fix main fragment in posterior tibial plateau, and intraoperative assessment of the stability of knee was done. An anterior approach was added if required.ResultsPosterolateral approach was employed in seven cases, posteromedial in three, and additional anteromedial in three, and anterolateral in two cases. The average time to union of all 10 fractures was 3.7 months (range 3-5.5 months). Nine patients had satisfactory articular reduction. The range of motion of the knee averaged 2° of extension to 110.5° of flexion. No patient complained of knee instability. The average postoperative HSS score at the final followup was 92.70.ConclusionsHigh-energy fractures of posterior tibial plateau could be well treated based on posterior approaches combined with necessary anterior approach if required.

2 keywords...

hide…