• Thomas Gösling, M Oszwald, D Kendoff, M Citak, C Krettek, and T Hufner.
• Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. goesling.thomas@mh-hannover.de
• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Nov 1;129(11):1521-6.

Materials And MethodsThe effect of fluoroscopy-based navigation for femoral fracture reduction on the prevention of malrotation was examined in an experimental setting followed by a first case series. Eleven cadaver femurs were used. All femurs were reduced by closed methods. An optoelectronic navigation system was utilized to check for fragment reduction and alignment. Fluoroscopic control without navigation was used as the control group. The Six Sigma Analysis [offset capability index (C (pk)) = 1.3] was used to compare the probability of outliers of more than 15 degrees . In the clinical case series the same navigation tool was used in ten non-consecutive patients with femoral fractures. Torsional differences between both legs were measured postoperatively by CT scan.ResultsThe highest malrotation in the navigated group was 7.0 degrees for the cadaver testings, while two femurs in the control group showed a difference of more than 10 degrees (10.3 degrees , 17.4 degrees). Only the navigated group showed a sufficient offset capability index (C (pk-navigated) = 1.83; C (pk-conventional) = 0.59). In the clinical series nine femurs were successfully reduced by navigation control. The average malrotation was 6.6 degrees . No patient had a torsional difference of more than 10 degrees.ConclusionNavigated femoral nailing reduces the risk for outliers of postoperative torsional differences and might avoid revision surgery for malrotation.Level Of EvidenceIV.

25 keywords...

hide…