-
Arch Phys Med Rehabil · Apr 2013
Multicenter Study Comparative StudyComparing rehabilitation services and outcomes between older and younger people with spinal cord injury.
- Ching-Hui Hsieh, Gerben DeJong, Suzanne Groah, Pamela H Ballard, Susan D Horn, and Wenqiang Tian.
- Center for Post-acute Innovation & Research, MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC 20010, USA. Jean.Hsieh@medstar.net
- Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Apr 1;94(4 Suppl):S175-86.
ObjectiveTo compare patient and injury characteristics, rehabilitation services, and outcomes between people incurring traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) at younger and older ages.DesignMultisite prospective observational cohort study.SettingSix acute rehabilitation facilities.ParticipantsPatients (N=866) aged ≥ 16 years admitted to participating centers for their initial rehabilitation after SCI.InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresMotor FIM scores at discharge and 1 year postinjury, discharge location, and postacute clinical pathways.ResultsPatients were divided into 4 age-at-injury groups: 16 to 29, 30 to 44, 45 to 60, and >60 years of age. Older adults (>60 y) incurring SCI were more likely to be married, retired/unemployed, on Medicare, and to have attained more education. Their injuries mostly resulted from falls and were incomplete in nature. The oldest group had the highest severity of illness, lowest admission and discharge motor FIM scores, and longer rehabilitation stay. They received relatively less rehabilitation than younger groups. They spent proportionately more time in occupational therapy working on preparatory activities and less time on self-care activities during inpatient rehabilitation. In the aged >60 years group, 80% went home at discharge; 17.2% were discharged to a nursing home. Younger groups were less likely to go to a nursing home. Admission motor FIM was the most significant predictor of motor FIM at discharge and 1-year anniversary across age groups. But the age groups differed significantly in patient and treatment factors that explained their respective outcomes.ConclusionsOlder injured individuals experienced a different clinical pathway from younger patients. The present study suggests the need for development of a rehabilitation program tailored specifically to older adults.Copyright © 2013 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.