• Francesco Puglisi, Antonio Crovace, Francesco Staffieri, Palma Capuano, Giuseppe Carravetta, Michele De Fazio, Giuseppe Lograno, Luca Lacitignola, Vito Leopoldo Troilo, Gennaro Martines, Carmine Chiumarulo, and Vincenzo Memeo.
• General Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari Medical School, Bari, Italy.
• Chir Ital. 2007 Jan 1;59(1):105-11.

AbstractThe aim of this study was to compare intraoperative hemodynamic and respiratory parameters using propofol and sevoflurane during laparoscopic surgery in a porcine model. After induction of general anaesthesia in 16 pigs with fentanyl (0.005 mg kg(-1)) followed by propofol (6 mg Kg(-1)), it was maintained with fentanyl (0.01 mg kg(-1)h(-1)) and sevoflurane in O2 in group 1 (G1, n = 8) and fentanyl and propofol (12 mg kg(-1)h(-1)) in group 2 (G2, n = 8). The parameters monitored were heart rate, airway pressure (PAW), arterial and venous blood pressures and arterial blood gas analysis. The carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum was maintained at 12 mmHg for 2 hours. Data were expressed as mean +/- standard deviation and were analysed using the Wilcoxon test (p < 0.05). G1 showed significantly higher PAW values than G2 at T60, T90 and T120. The heart rate values were significantly higher in G1 at T90 and T120. Middle arterial pressure was significantly lower in G1 than G2 at T30 and T60. The base deficit was significantly greater in G1 at T60, T90, T120 and Tpost. In this study propofol assured better hemodynamic and respiratory conditions than sevoflurane during laparoscopy in a porcine model.

33 keywords...

hide…