-
- R L Waters and R H Adkins.
- Rancho Los Amigos Medical Center, Downey, California.
- Spine. 1991 Aug 1;16(8):934-9.
AbstractSerial motor and sensory examinations were conducted on 90 patients with bullet fragments lodged in the spinal canal. Annual follow-up examinations were completed on 66 patients. Despite the fact that approximately 20% of the bullets had perforated the alimentary canal, no cases of infection were noted. Statistical analyses indicated that removal of the bullet fragments made no significant difference with regard to reducing pain or improving the recovery of sensation. However, bullet removal did have an effect on motor recovery, depending on the level at which the lesion occurred. Among those patients with lesions between vertebral levels T12 and L4, there was significantly greater (P less than 0.001) motor recovery in those patients from whom the bullet was removed from than in patients not having bullet removal. Bullet removal from the canal between T1 and T11 had no significant effect on motor recovery.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..