• Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd · Nov 1994

    [Dutch results of the European study of the prevalence of infections during intensive care (EPIIC). I. Who is at risk?].

    • M S Ibelings and H A Bruining.
    • Ikazia Ziekenhuis, afd. Heelkunde, Rotterdam.
    • Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1994 Nov 5;138(45):2239-43.

    ObjectiveEvaluation of the point prevalence of infections acquired in an intensive care unit (ICU) and determination of risk factors for ICU patients.DesignDescriptive study.Setting78 Dutch ICUs.MethodCollecting data by detailed questionnaires for each patient admitted to one of the participating ICUs, on one specified day: April 29th, 1992. Follow-up lasted 6 weeks.ResultsIncluded in the study were 472 patients; 176 (37%) suffered from an infection, of which 74 (16%) was ICU-acquired. The most important risk factors were: a longer ICU stay (relative risk (RR) 4.23 (95% confidence interval: 3.32-5.40), 99.37 (22.26-434.50) and 146.79 (32.83-656.30) for ICU stays of 3-4 days, 1-2 and more than 3 weeks respectively, in comparison with 0-2 days), correlated with severity of disease (organ dysfunction) and more medical interventions (intubation, urine catheter). The ICU infection risk was lower after elective surgery than after ICU admission without surgery; after emergency surgery the ICU infection risk was higher. During follow-up 63 (14%) patients died. Patients suffering from an ICU infection had a higher mortality risk; the strongest prognostic factor in determining the mortality risk was the APACHE II score (RR: 13 (3.89-42.69) with a score between 16-26 and RR > 100 (7.67-1377.93) with score > 31).ConclusionICU-acquired infections are a serious problem. Programmes for infection prevention and control need to be adjusted.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.