• B Cowie, R Kluger, S Rex, and C Missant.
• Department of Anaesthesia, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.
• Anaesthesia. 2015 Mar 1;70(3):258-63.

AbstractWith the reduction in use of the pulmonary artery catheter, alternative methods of pulmonary pressure estimation are required. The use of echocardiographically-derived right ventricular systolic pressure has recently been questioned, but this technique has not been validated in anaesthetised surgical patients with transoesophageal echocardiography. One hundred measurements of right ventricular systolic pressure with transoesophageal echocardiography were compared with the pulmonary artery systolic pressure obtained simultaneously from a pulmonary artery catheter in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Simultaneous right ventricular systolic pressure and pulmonary artery systolic pressure measurements were possible in all patients, and these measurements were strongly correlated (r = 0.98, p < 0.001), with minimal bias and narrow limits of agreement (approximately -5 to +5 mmHg), across a broad range of pulmonary pressures. Measurement of right ventricular systolic pressure using tranoesophageal echocardiography is readily achievable and closely correlates with pulmonary artery systolic pressure, with minimal bias, in cardiac surgical patients undergoing general anaesthesia and positive pressure mechanical ventilation of the lungs.© 2014 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

33 keywords...

hide…