• Am J Otolaryngol · May 1998

    The comparative strength of laryngeal fracture fixation.

    • C L Lykins and E F Pinczower.
    • Department of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle 98195, USA.
    • Am J Otolaryngol. 1998 May 1;19(3):158-62.

    PurposeTo assess the fixation strength provided by miniplate fixation, wire-tube batten fixation, and wire fixation alone in repair of thyroid cartilage.Materials And MethodsSegments 2.5-cm wide x 1-cm long were cut from three fresh, frozen, human cadaveric larynges from an 83-year-old man, a 58-year-old woman, and an unknown cadaver. A vertical fracture was induced and repaired with one of three randomly assigned fixation techniques (n=10 in each fixation group). The repaired cartilage was placed in an Instron Universal Testing Device (Boston, MA) and subjected to a three-point bending test. Load to failure was recorded on an analogue graph.ResultsAll reconstruction techniques significantly differed from each other, with miniplate fixation providing a stronger repair than wire tube batten (P < .05), wire tube batten providing a stronger repair than wire alone (P < .01), and miniplate providing a stronger repair than wire alone (P < .001).ConclusionIn experimentally induced fractures of the human larynx, miniplate fixation consistently yielded the strongest repair. Although both miniplate and wire batten produced excellent anatomic reaction, we feel that miniplate fixation was easier to perform.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…