-
Comparative Study
Clinical experiences with the use of an automated perimeter (Octopus) in the diagnosis and management of patients with glaucoma and neurologic diseases.
- S G Li, G L Spaeth, H A Scimeca, N J Schatz, and P J Savino.
- Glaucoma Service, Wills Eye Hospital-Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19130.
- Ophthalmology. 1979 Jul 1;86(7):1302-16.
AbstractThis is a study of 59 patients, 42 with glaucoma and 17 with neurological disease, to compare the Octopus automated perimeter with the conventional Goldmann and Tubinger perimeters for detection and assessment of visual field defects. We believe the Octopus automated perimeter is an excellent method for screening patients suspected of glaucoma and can be expected to identify over 90% of the patients actually having visual field loss due to glaucoma. In patients with neurological disease, the Goldmann perimeter was superior to either the Octopus or Tubinger perimeters in providing clinically useful information.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..