• Der Anaesthesist · Dec 2014

    [Standardized telephone-assisted instructions on resuscitation by laypersons : Feasibility study using Video-assisted quality analysis.]

    • J C Nest, D Steinbrunner, M Karger, M Hiltl, F von Kaufmann, K-G Kanz, and U Kreimeier.
    • Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum der Universität München (LMU), Campus Innenstadt, Nussbaumstr. 20, 80336, München, Deutschland, jnest@med.lmu.de.
    • Anaesthesist. 2014 Dec 1;63(12):919-31.

    BackgroundTelephone-assisted instructions for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) are highly recommended by the current European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines for resuscitation 2010.AimThe aim of this study was to analyze the adherence of laypersons to T-CPR instructions given by dispatchers in a mock scenario. The dispatchers adapted international T-CPR instructions to local requirements.Material And MethodsAn emergency "collapse in the office" with subsequent T-CPR was simulated for 10 volunteer, untrained administrative staff, as the only single emergency witness and 4 emergency medical service (EMS) dispatchers. Each volunteer was sent to a "colleague" who simulated a sudden cardiovascular event and collapsed unconscious during the description of symptoms. The local lay responder made an emergency call by landline telephone and was connected to the dispatcher. In the course of the simulation the "victim" was replaced by a CPR manikin.ResultsEvery participant, i.e. 10 out of 10, assessed the victim, recognized the situation and telephoned for help. On the orders of the dispatchers 9 out of the 10 activated the loudspeaker of the telephone but 4 still continued to use the handset. The instructions for positioning were followed by all 10. Correct positioning of the victim required a median of 33[Symbol: see text]s with an interquartile range (IQR) of 30-39[Symbol: see text]s. Breathing control including instructions lasted a median of 54[Symbol: see text]s (IQR 49-60[Symbol: see text]s). Breathing was assessed by 8 out of 10 but only 2 out of 8 achieved a duration of 10[Symbol: see text]s as recommended by the ERC guidelines for resuscitation 2010. After a median of 202[Symbol: see text]s (IQR 196-241[Symbol: see text]s) chest compressions were started by 9 out of 10 and were performed for a median of 63[Symbol: see text]s (IQR 60-69[Symbol: see text]s). A correct technique was used by 7 but with a low rate of 80 compressions/min (IQR 72-86/min). The instructions for ventilation were understood by 9 out of 10. Mouth-to-mouth resuscitation was performed by 7 participants and technically correct by 5 of them. The ventilation cycle of the 7 active participants lasted for a mean of 25[Symbol: see text]s (IQR 24-30[Symbol: see text]s). The mean total duration of the timeframe analyzed was 340[Symbol: see text]s (IQR 334-368[Symbol: see text]s).ConclusionThe results demonstrate that the local T-CPR concept for untrained laypersons is feasible in a mock scenario. No substantial errors were observed for the majority of the untrained responders but the simulation also showed that not every emergency witness implemented the instructions according to the dispatcher's expectations. The T-CPR procedure was also more time-consuming than expected; therefore, every standardized T-CPR concept should be tested for local practicability. In accordance with current studies, the results suggest that the focus should be on compression-only CPR instructions in urban settings. Dispatcher education in T-CPR should incorporate videotaped mock-up scenarios with untrained local laypersons.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.