• A C Soares, R Leite, M A Tatsuo, and I D Duarte.
• Departamento de Farmacologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Campus da Pampulha, CEP: 31.270.100, Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
• Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2000 Jul 14; 400 (1): 67-71.

AbstractUsing the rat paw pressure test, in which sensitivity is increased by intraplantar injection of prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)), we conducted a study using several K(+) channel blockers. The objective was to determine what types of K(+) channels could be involved in the peripheral antinociceptive action of the nitric oxide donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP). SNP elicited a dose-dependent (250 and 500 microgram/paw) peripheral antinociceptive effect, which was considered local, since only higher doses produced an effect in the contralateral paw. The effect of SNP (500 microgram/paw) was dose-dependently antagonized by intraplantar administration of the sulfonylureas tolbutamide (20, 40 and 160 microgram) and glibenclamide (40, 80 and 160 microgram), selective blockers of ATP-sensitive K(+) channels. Charybdotoxin (2 microgram/paw), a selective blocker of high conductance Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channels, and apamin (10 microgram/paw), a selective blocker of low conductance Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channels, did not modify the peripheral antinociception induced by SNP. Tetraethylammonium (2 mg/paw), 4-aminopyridine (200 microgram/paw) and cesium (800 microgram/paw) also had no effect. Based on this experimental evidence, we conclude that the activation of ATP-sensitive K(+) channels could be the mechanism by which nitric oxide, donated by SNP, induces peripheral antinociception, and that Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channels and voltage-dependent K(+) channels appear not to be involved in the process.

29 keywords...

hide…