• Int J Obstet Anesth · Aug 2016

    Meta Analysis Comparative Study

    Duration of motor block with intrathecal ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for caesarean section: a meta-analysis.

    When used for Caesarean section, intrathecal ropivacaine results in faster recovery of motor block but no difference in onset, sensory duration or GA conversion when compared to bupivacaine.

    pearl
    • R Malhotra, C Johnstone, S Halpern, J Hunter, and A Banerjee.
    • Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
    • Int J Obstet Anesth. 2016 Aug 1; 27: 9-16.

    BackgroundBupivacaine is a commonly used local anaesthetic for spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section, but may produce prolonged motor block, delaying discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit. Ropivacaine may have a shorter time to recovery of motor function compared with bupivacaine. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the time difference in duration of motor block with intrathecal ropivacaine compared with bupivacaine for caesarean section.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for randomised controlled trials comparing ropivacaine with bupivacaine in parturients undergoing elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. The primary outcome was the duration of motor block. Secondary outcomes included the time to onset of sensory block, need for conversion to general anaesthesia and the incidence of hypotension.ResultsThirteen trials comprising 743 spinal anaesthetics were included. Intrathecal ropivacaine resulted in a reduced duration of motor block, regressing 35.7min earlier compared with intrathecal bupivacaine (P<0.00001). There was no difference in the time to onset of sensory block (P=0.25) or the incidence of hypotension (P=0.10). Limited data suggested no difference in the rate of conversion to general anaesthesia, but an earlier request for postoperative analgesia with ropivacaine.ConclusionsCompared with bupivacaine, intrathecal ropivacaine is associated with more rapid recovery of motor block despite similar sensory properties and no increased rate of conversion to general anaesthesia. This may be useful in centres in which recovery of motor block is a criterion for discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit. However, small numbers of trials and significant heterogeneity limit the interpretation of our results.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

    pearl
    1

    When used for Caesarean section, intrathecal ropivacaine results in faster recovery of motor block but no difference in onset, sensory duration or GA conversion when compared to bupivacaine.

    Daniel Jolley  Daniel Jolley
     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.