• T Arai, K Dote, I Tsukahara, K Nitta, and T Nagaro.
• Resuscitation. 1984 Jul 1; 12 (2): 147-54.

AbstractThe following parameters were monitored simultaneously in 15 dogs, in order to evaluate the efficacy of conventional CPR (C-CPR), new CPR (N-CPR), and open-chest CPR (O-CPR) on cerebral perfusion: arterial blood pressure (BP), central venous pressure (CVP), intrathoracic airway pressure, blood flow in carotid artery, intracranial pressure (ICP), sagittal sinus blood flow (sinus BF) and pressure (sinus P), and blood flow in cerebral cortex (cortical BF). The sinus blood flow was measured by the direct-method and with a cannulating electromagnetic flowmeter. The cortical blood flow was measured with a termocouple tissue flowmeter. Intracranial pressure was obtained by measuring subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Ventricular fibrillation was induced electrically. Chest compression and ventilation were always done manually in all cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The mean blood pressures during C-CPR, N-CPR and O-CPR were 52, 68 and 95 mmHg, respectively, and mean carotid blood flows per stroke were 36, 71 and 131% of the control values, respectively. The intracranial pressures were 30, 42 and 36 mmHg, respectively, giving the calculated cerebral perfusion pressures (BP-ICP) of 22, 27 and 60 mmHg, respectively. This should have been reflected in cerebral blood flow. Sinus blood flows/min were 18, 18 and 42%, and sinus blood flows per stroke were 55, 45 and 127% of control values, respectively; the differences between C-CPR and N-CPR were not significant. This was also true for cortical blood flow. From this we conclude that, firstly, N-CPR is not significantly better than C-CPR in cerebral perfusion because of its accompanying high intracranial pressure, secondly, O-CPR is far superior to the other two methods in respect of cerebral perfusion.

7 keywords...

hide…